Vatican distances itself from commission member’s comments on cardinal

By Cindy Wooden

Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY – The views and opinions of a member of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors who criticized Australian Cardinal George Pell on an Australian television program do not reflect the opinion of the commission nor its role, the Vatican spokesman said.

The commission “does not have the task of investigating and pronouncing judgment on individual cases,” said Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman. Investigations are carried out by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Commission member Peter Saunders, a British survivor of sexual abuse and co-founder of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, appeared in a “60 Minutes” segment broadcast May 31 by Australia’s Channel Nine.

Asked about Cardinal Pell and the way he handled allegations about abusive priests, Saunders said, “I personally think his position is untenable, because he has now a catalogue of denials, he has a catalogue of denigrating people, of acting with callousness, cold heartedness, almost sociopathic I would go so far as to say, this lack of care.”

Father Lombardi, in a statement June 1, said Saunders spoke for himself and “not in the name of the commission,” which Pope Francis instituted to help the church develop better policies and procedures for protecting minors and providing them with pastoral care.

The commission, in a statement released late June 2, also said it “has no jurisdiction to comment on individual cases or inquiries.”

The commission, it said, is dedicated to helping the church “protect minors and make certain that the interests of abuse survivors and victims’ are paramount. To this end the commission considers it essential that those in positions of authority in the church respond promptly, transparently and with the clear intent of enabling justice to be achieved.”

The “60 Minutes” segment focused on the ongoing government hearings about clerical sexual abuse in the Diocese of Ballarat, Australia, the diocese in which Cardinal Pell was born and where he ministered until being named an auxiliary bishop of Melbourne in 1987.

The Australian government’s Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse began its Ballarat hearings May 19. In a statement June 1, the commission said: “The chair has received a letter from Cardinal Pell indicating that he is prepared to come to Australia to give evidence. The Royal Commission will ask him to give evidence in the second of the Ballarat hearings.” The dates have not been announced.

A statement from Cardinal Pell’s spokesman May 31 said the cardinal “has been informed of the contents of the 60 Minutes program this evening. The false and misleading claims made against His Eminence are outrageous.”

“Cardinal Pell has never met Mr. Saunders, who seems to have formed his strong opinions without ever having spoken to His Eminence,” the statement said. “In light of all of the available material, including evidence from the cardinal under oath, there is no excuse for broadcasting incorrect and prejudicial material.

“In the circumstances,” the statement said, “the cardinal is left no alternative but to consult with his legal advisers.”

Prior to the broadcast, but after Channel Nine released promotional material, the cardinal’s spokesman issued a statement saying, “Cardinal Pell knows of the important work Mr. Saunders has done as a survivor of abuse to assist victims, including the establishment of a victims survivors group in the United Kingdom and more recently serving as member of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors established by the Holy Father to develop policy to achieve this.”

However, the statement said, “it seems clear Mr. Saunders is not well informed about the claims made against Cardinal Pell in the Ballarat hearings of the Royal Commission and the fact that no new material emerged during recent hearings.”

The statement said Cardinal Pell “has never condoned or protected offenders, has never condoned or participated in moving known offenders and did not at any time attempt to bribe David Ridsdale, whose story has varied many times over the years.”

Gerald Ridsdale was a Ballarat priest whom Australian media describe as the country’s “most notorious pedophile priest.” Convicted of abusing more than 50 children, the former priest is in prison.

His victims included his nephew, David Ridsdale, who told the Royal Commission that he informed then-Bishop Pell of the abuse in 1993 and that the bishop responded by asking what the nephew would want in exchange for his silence.

In a statement May 20, after David Ridsdale testified, Cardinal Pell said, “I was and remain extremely sympathetic to David Ridsdale, who because of his uncle suffered horrible abuse.

“I continue to regret the misunderstanding between us. At no time did I attempt to bribe David Ridsdale or his family or offer any financial inducements for him to be silent,” the cardinal said. “At the time of our discussion the police were already aware of allegations against Gerald Ridsdale and were investigating. Then, and now, I supported these police investigations. I have previously made a sworn denial of these allegations and I reiterate that denial.”

Father Lombardi, commenting June 1, told reporters the statements of the cardinal, who is now prefect of the Vatican Secretariat for the Economy, “must be considered reliable and deserving of respect and attention.”

In a statement June 1, Archbishop Denis Hart of Melbourne said, “We’ve got to recognize George Pell has done a tremendous amount to set up practices to assist victims (and) to deal with offending priests.”

Two days later, seven other Australian bishops issued a statement of support for Cardinal Pell saying, “His style can be robust and direct; he does not wear his heart on his sleeve. But underneath he has a big heart for people.”

“Cardinal Pell was one of the first bishops in the world to put in place a comprehensive church response to investigate allegations of sexual abuse by Catholic clergy and to provide survivors with redress and counseling,” the seven bishops said. “He has responded to criticisms that have been made of his handling of these matters over the years, acknowledged mistakes frankly, and apologized for them.”

 Also see:

The cardinal Down Under

Copyright (c) 2015 Catholic News Service/U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops

 

 
 

image_pdfSave as PDFimage_printSend to Printer

Catholic Review

Catholic Review

The Catholic Review is the official publication of the Archdiocese of Baltimore.